Enhancements

The selection list presented to a player to select themselves from the rating list does not show the rating used for the section they have selected which can cause confusion. This is partly because they may not have selected the section yet.

Should the rating chosen for the section be in the Swiss Manager Rating_Nat or Rating_Int fields ? or does it not matter?

When someone enters a congress and gets their email wrong ( for example putting 2 ls in gmaill! ), or you try to send a mass email to previous congress entrants and their email does not work any more, then I get a mail delivery error sent to donotreply@congress.org.uk. But I don't have time to respond to all these. Possible solutions are - someone else volunteers to do something with these or we create a separate email forwarder for every congress to they get the email delivery errors, but then someone has to set up these forwarding rules and I need help with that. Also it might be possible to report errors to the organiser who is sending the mass email.

When sending mass emails it might be possible to detect failures due to invalid email addresses and report these back so that those people could be removed from the mailing list.

The functionality for using an alternative rating for an unrated player is not working. For example, it used to do things like use the national rating for unrated players in a FIDE event instead of the FIDE rating. Or use standard rating if no rapid/allegro. At the moment it either uses the rating for the section or the one specified by the organiser in "assigned rating" if they have done so.

For FIDE events, use whichever rating is higher FIDE or national rating (optional? ) to populate the swiss manager files and to check the section rating limit.

Have a way to take the maximum of the FIDE and ECF ratings to decided section eligibility:
Rating Type: Max, Rate of Play: Rapid, Rating Order: Max(fide_rapid,live_rapid), Max(fide,live_national)